“对号入座”的字义,如今已引申为我们日常生活中对待报刊上不确切指名批评的一种反馈现象。问题的症结不在于“对号入座”这一现象本身,而在于怎样“对号入座”上。据已知的一些情况看,大多是这样“对号入座”的——或反唇相诘,或谤之失实,或诬为陷害,或倒打一耙,甚而至于对簿公堂。更有甚者,有权职的还要对作者施以打击报复、小鞋大棒,这可叫人如何消受得了。于是有人大声疾呼《何必“对号入座”?》,寄语一些捕风捉影者,不必把对一种社会现象的批评,据为己有,生拉硬扯地往自己身上贴,然后便肝 The meaning of “condemnation” has now been extended to a phenomenon of feedback in our daily life that we deal with imprecisely named criticisms in newspapers and periodicals. The crux of the matter lies not in the phenomenon of “seated condemnation” itself, but in how to “conquer the throne”. According to some known circumstances, most of them are “allegory” - or anti-lip synagogue, or slander, or falsely framed, or even against the court. What is more, those who have the power but also on the authors to retaliate retaliation, a big stick, which can be how people get it. So someone shout “why” condemnation “?”, Message some of the catcher, do not have to criticize a social phenomenon, according to own, students pull on themselves to paste, and then Liver