“新生活运动”以促成民族精神为目的。民族精神是孙中山提倡的。蒋介石提倡民族精神的目的是消除“内忧外患”。但他把民族精神与法西斯主义联系起来,这是错误的。胡适与国民党的关系从对立到既有分歧又有合作的过程,使得他对“新生活运动”的评论及其温和。宋庆龄对“新生活运动”的批评体现了唯物史观的影响。以上这些思想上的互动,构成了近代中国思想发展的内在逻辑。 “New Life Campaign ” to promote national spirit for the purpose. National spirit is advocated by Sun Yat-sen. The purpose of Chiang Kai-shek’s advocacy of the national spirit is to eliminate “internal and external problems.” But he linked the national spirit with fascism, which is wrong. The process of the relationship between Hu Shi and the Kuomintang proceeding from the opposition to the existing disagreement and cooperation made his comments on “New Life Movement” and its moderation. Soong Ching Ling’s criticism of “New Life Movement ” reflects the influence of historical materialism. These above-mentioned ideological interactions constitute the internal logic of the development of modern Chinese thought.