论文部分内容阅读
在现代中国社会的政治变革和学术发展过程中,“封建社会”是一个相当重要的范畴和概念。它曾经体现着中国人对长达数千年历史认识的话语,也曾作为革命运动的对象。然而,它又是一个颇具歧义,难以获得人们普遍认同的范畴和概念。当今学术界更是对它的本源意义和在中国的真实含义提出了种种质疑。因而,从学术角度上,对“封建社会”进行深入探讨,考究马克思主义经典作家及中外历史学家对它是如何加以表述与应用,辨析中国历史上是否确实经历过封建社会形态,考察国际学术界对封建社会的研究进展状况以及对封建社会是否为一个具有普世性意义的社会形态做出科学的判断,具有相当重要的学术价值和社会意义。我校学者对这一问题的研究起步较早且颇有深度,老一辈学者日知先生早在2 0世纪5 0年代就曾从语义学和历史学双重角度,对“封建主义问题”进行了深入的研究,许多中青年学者也从不同角度和视野出发对此发表见解。本期学报所刊载的这组论文,即是对此问题做进一步的探讨,以期获得学界同仁的关注与批评,共同推动“封建社会”问题研究向更为深入、更为全面的方向发展。
In the process of political change and academic development in modern Chinese society, “feudal society” is a very important category and concept. It once embodies the Chinese people’s understanding of thousands of years of discourse, but also as the object of the revolutionary movement. However, it is another area and concept that is quite ambiguous and difficult to gain universal acceptance. Today’s academic circles are all doubts about its original significance and its true meaning in China. Therefore, from an academic point of view, we should conduct an in-depth study of the “feudal society”, examine how the classic Marxist writers and Chinese and foreign historians have formulated and applied it, and whether or not China’s history has really experienced the feudal social form and the international academic studies The research status of feudal society and the scientific judgment of whether feudal society is a universal social form have very important academic value and social significance. Researchers in our school started the research on this issue quite early and profound. The scholar of the older generation, Mr. Sunichi, once conducted “the problem of feudalism” from the perspective of semantics and history as early as the 1950s In-depth research, many young and middle-aged scholars from different angles and perspectives to express their views. This group of dissertations published in the current issue is a further discussion of this issue, with a view to obtaining the attention and criticism of academic colleagues, and jointly promoting the study of the issue of “feudal society” in a more in-depth and more comprehensive direction.