这篇文章意在提出一个有关罗森玛丽·特罗克尔(Rosemarie Trockel)的女权主义的问题。进行这项工作的还不只我一个,其他理论家也在作类似的事情。特罗克尔的作品同样引起批评的反应,对它们的批评完全不在于字句中碰巧所具有的文字含义,人们在字句中试图发现的主要是其女权主义的定义,或是在作品的形式与作者的性别中发现偶然的联系,或者两者兼而有之。这种努力从一开始就不单纯是内容的结果,而是文化关系的结果。对她来说,决定性 This article is intended to raise a question about feminism in Rosemarie Trockel. There is more to me than this one and other theorists are doing similar things. Trocek’s work also caused criticism. Criticism of them entirely lies not in the literal meanings of words and phrases, but in the words and phrases they try to find out mainly the definition of feminism, Occasionally found in the author’s gender, or both. Such efforts have not been the result of content from the very beginning, but the result of cultural relations. For her, decisive