事实与价值的区分是当代西方价值哲学中的重要问题。元伦理学的开创者摩尔为这一区分做出了重要贡献。之后,任何把事实与价值联系起来的努力,都必然要回答摩尔的“开放问题论证”。早期自然主义的努力没有成功地回答摩尔的问题,以塞尔为代表的自然主义从制度事实方面回答摩尔的问题论证,对事实与价值的关系给予了新的理解。重新理解事实与价值的关系,就要看到社会制度性事实对于社会价值所具有的决定性作用。 The distinction between facts and values ​​is an important issue in contemporary western value philosophy. Moore, the pioneer of meta-ethics, made an important contribution to this distinction. Afterwards, any attempt to link facts with values ​​inevitably has to answer Moore’s argument on open issues. Early naturalist efforts failed to answer the question of Moore successfully. Naturalism represented by Searle answered the question of Moore from the institutional reality and gave a new understanding of the relationship between reality and value. To re-understand the relationship between facts and values, we should see the social system has a decisive role for social values.