论文部分内容阅读
对比新批评派中艾略特的“非个人化”诗论与中国古代文论中“用典”这一命题的相关概念。本文阐述艾略特的“非个人化”诗学理论的理论内涵,并梳理中国古代关于“用典”问题的历史源流,发现二者不乏相似之处。通过相互对比我们发现,结合中国古代文论对用典问题的现有研究成果,对艾略特非个人化理论的进一步阐发提供了新的视域。同样,对于我们更好的认识中西文论的异同与互补,促进中西文论的融合有一定的现实意义。
Compares the related concepts of Eliot ’s “impersonal ” poetics in the new criticism and the proposition of “usage code ” in Chinese ancient literary theory. This essay elaborates the theoretical connotation of Eliot’s “non-personal ” poetics theory and combs the origin of history in ancient China about the problem of “usage code ”, and finds that there are many similarities between them. By contrasting with each other, we find that combining the ancient Chinese literary theory with the existing research results of the Canon of Dictionaries provides a new perspective for the further elucidation of Eliot’s non-personal theory. Similarly, it is of practical significance for us to better understand the similarities, differences and complementarities between Chinese and Western literary theories and to promote the integration of Chinese and Western literary theories.