对《义务教育语文课程标准》提出的“语文课程应该是开放而富有创新活力的”这一提法,我满怀敬意。我只是觉得“开放”也得有一定的限度。事实上,自从新课程一路逶迤而来,语文一直在“剑走偏锋”:“思品味”过重,导致语言训练处于边缘地带;“音乐味”过浓,表面花里胡哨,实则单薄脆弱;“科学味”太重,致使语文陷入一个岌岌可危的生态困境。如何取舍,如何站在建设的立场上进行有价值的甄别、梳理和筛选,应该成为语文教师的常态性工程。以下 With respect to the Compulsory Education Standard for Chinese Curriculum, “Chinese curriculum should be open and full of energy”. I have full respect. I just think “open ” also have a certain limit. In fact, since the new curriculum came all the way, the Chinese language has always been at the edge of language training; “music taste ” too thick, the surface bells and whistles, But fragile in reality; “scientific taste ” is too heavy, resulting in language into a precarious ecological predicament. How to choose, how to stand in the construction of the position of valuable screening, sorting and screening, should become the normal project of Chinese teachers. the following