某年,北京市东城区人民法院民事审判庭受理案件一桩。 原告:李丽,女,22岁,汉族,某航空公司空中乘务员。 原告:冯刚,男,30岁,汉族,某航空公司职员。 被告:北京爱多婚纱影楼。 案由:侵犯肖像权。 十几年的审判经验,对于侵犯肖像权案件,我(主审法官)已积累了少许经验。常有因被告未经原告同意,私自刊登原告照片为主要内容的广告而引发了纠纷。可是,这一次却出人意料地有着更新的内容。 In a certain year, the Dongcheng District People’s Court Beijing Civil Trial Court accepted a case. Plaintiff: Li Li, female, 22 years old, Han nationality, an airline flight attendant. Plaintiff: Feng Gang, male, 30 years old, Han nationality, an airline employee. Defendant: Beijing love more wedding photo studio. Case: Infringement of portrait rights. More than a decade of trial experience, I (the trial judge) has accumulated a small amount of experience in cases of portrait rights violations. Often the defendant without the plaintiffs consent, privately plaintiff photos as the main content of the ads and triggered a dispute. However, this time it unexpectedly has updated content.