论文部分内容阅读
题为陆游纂抄的《避暑漫抄》,自明陆楫所编《古今说海》刊布以来,历代学人皆以之为陆游的著作而加以引证研究,且迄今已有《全宋笔记》、《陆游全集校注》两种整理本。论文通过以《避暑漫抄》引录叶绍翁《四朝闻见录》一条材料为切口,论证《四朝闻见录》成书于陆游身后,陆游不可能纂抄及此,并进而对《避暑漫抄》全书的文献来源进行了调查,考明全书28则材料中有24则见于传世的唐宋笔记,《避暑漫抄》基本不改动地进行抄录,只是标注出处时以假乱真,或杜撰子虚乌有的书名。《避暑漫抄》实际是明人编纂的丛脞之书,为炫声价而伪托陆游,作伪者以陆楫的可能性为最大。然而书中史料非假造,所载“宋太祖誓碑”一事,极有可能也有宋代笔记文献的依据,可以作为一条宋代的真史料来引证。
Since the publication of the ancient and modern sayings of the sea by Lu Yao, the ancient scholars have all cited and studied the writings of Lu You as their own, and so far they have been entitled “All Song Notes” “Complete Works of Lu You Notes” two finishing. The paper through the “summer Mancha” cited Ye Shao-weng, “Siu Wen Wen Lu Lu,” a material incision, argues that “Siu Wen Wen Lu Lu” into the book after Lu You, Lu You can not copy and this, and then “ Copies of the book’s source of the literature conducted a survey, Kao Ming Quan 28 28 materials are found in the handed down the Tang and Song Notes, ”Summer Man copy“ basically no change to copy, just mark the source of false or false, or fictional books name. ”Manchu copy" is actually a book compiled by the Ming Dynasty Cong Cong book, for the price of sound and false caregivers, the perpetrators of Lu Yu is the possibility of the largest. However, the historical materials in the book are not fake. It contains most of the evidence that the Song Taizu vows the monument. It is very likely that there is also a basis for the notes in the Song Dynasty. It can be cited as a historical material in the Song Dynasty.