论文部分内容阅读
在阻却违法事由的成立上要求防卫意思与避难意思之主观正当化要素,却否定主观违法要素的存在,基于相对概念的逻辑关系,若否认主观违法要素则同时应否认主观正当化要素,进而在正当防卫或紧急避难的成立上,亦不需要防卫意思或避难意思的观点上,唯有承认主观违法要素才能回避这个逻辑上的矛盾,并将主观违法要素置于违法性阶段中,对行为人超越故意、过失的主观内容是否具有实质违法性进行个别地、具体地评价,以确定是否为不法而成立犯罪。
On the obstruction of the cause of illegality, it requires the subjective justification elements of the meaning of defense and asylum, but negates the existence of subjective elements of illegality. Based on the logical relationship of relative concepts, if the subjective element of law is denied, the elements of subjective justification should be denied at the same time In the view that the establishment of justifiable defense or emergency shelter does not require the meaning of defense or asylum, only by admitting the elements of subjective violation can we avoid this logical contradiction and place the elements of subjective violation in the stage of illegality, Beyond the deliberate, negligent subjective content whether the substantive illegality of individual and specific evaluation, to determine whether it is unlawful to set up a crime.