我从事哲学理论工作算来已经五十多年了,学哲学教哲学已经成为我生活中的主要部分,但是总感到“学然后知不足,教而后知困”。在教学中讲辩证法与形而上学的对立比较多,但很少讲与诡辩论的对立,很少揭示现实生活中的诡辩论。讲哲学只是按照原著和教科书的内容要求,所批评的是哲? I have been engaged in the work of philosophical theory for over fifty years. Philosophy and philosophy have become the major part of my life. However, I always feel that I should “learn and then lack of knowledge, and then teach and sleep.” In teaching, dialectics and metaphysics oppose more, but seldom talk with sophistry and seldom reveal sophistry in real life. Philosophy is only in accordance with the original content and textbook content requirements, the criticism is philosophy?