王建疆关于中国美学与主义及其别现代的理论表达了中国哲学、人文学科包括美学要通过建立主义而达到与其不断增长的经济实力和科技实力相匹配的软实力目标。艾尔雅维茨与他的争议不仅仅是汉语与英语中对于“主义”的不同理解和不同界定,而是有着深刻的如朗西埃所说的平等与不平等、解放与未解放之间的哲学问题。通过朗西埃对贾寇托特教学法的解析发现,传统的建立在解释和阐释基础上的教与学,在根本上忽视了人的平等和解放,造就了顺从和盲目跟进的被动式接受。在平等哲学的视野中观照中国美学,中国的理论界不应该遵循朗西埃主张抛弃的教与学的老路,即甘当学生的老路,或者是解释的老路,而是坚持平等的观念,立足于本土现实提出自己的理论。我们发现,别现代主义就是朗西埃所说的构成平等的桥梁和媒介,是在中国理论与西方理论之间既接近又保持距离,或者既保持距离又可能接近,从而在完全平等的意义上使中西方理论都能得到验证。 Wang Jianjiang’s theory of Chinese aesthetics and its non-modernism expresses the philosophy of Chinese soft power that the humanities including aesthetics need to achieve its matching strength with its growing economic strength and scientific and technological strength through establishmentism. Instead of different understandings and different definitions of “doctrine ” in both Chinese and English, Ayvewitz has a profound dispute with him about Equality and Unequalness as Lancey calls liberation and emancipation Between the philosophical issues. Through the analysis of Jaquetot’s pedagogical method by Loncy et al., It is found that the traditional teaching and learning based on interpretation and interpretation fundamentally neglects the equality and liberation of people and creates the passive acceptance of obedience and blind follow-up . Looking at Chinese aesthetics from the perspective of the philosophy of equality, China’s theoretical circle should not follow the old way of teaching and learning advocated by Rousillon’s, that is, the old way of being a willing student or the old way of explanation. Instead, he insists on the idea of ​​equality and foothold Put forward my own theory on the local reality. We find that non-modernism is the bridge and medium of equality that Rousseau said constitutes an approach to equality and equality between the theory of China and the theory of the West, both in and out of close proximity or in the sense of complete equality So that both western and Chinese theories can be verified.