论文部分内容阅读
在我国,自然资源国家所有权应属于民法上的所有权,而非“主权性权力”;从大陆法系主要国家的立法例与学说,结合我国民事立法与理论来看,自然资源使用权理所当然应归入用益物权的范畴,“准物权”说不符合传统物权理论完整的制度设计与体系效应,应予以摒弃。自然资源权在结构上应区分自然资源国家所有权、自然资源使用权、资源出产物个人所有权三类,它们都属于物权;在立法模式上应选择一般法与特别法相结合的形式,在物权法或将来民法典中只作原则性规定,而由单行特别法作具体规范设计,以保障法律体系的完整与协调,促进自然资源的效用最大化与价值的扩张。
In our country, the state ownership of natural resources should belong to the ownership of civil law, not the “sovereign power”; from the legislative cases and doctrines of major countries in the civil law system and from the perspective of civil legislation and theory in our country, the right to use natural resources for granted Should be included in the scope of usufructuary rights, “quasi-property ” that does not meet the traditional theory of property rights complete system design and system effects, should be abandoned. The structure of natural resources should be distinguished from the state ownership of natural resources, the right to use natural resources and the individual ownership of resources to produce. All of them belong to the real right. In the legislative mode, the combination of general law and special law should be chosen. In the future, the civil code will only provide for the principle and the special laws of the single bank will be used for the specific normative design so as to ensure the integrity and coordination of the legal system and to promote the maximization of the utility of natural resources and the expansion of values.