论文部分内容阅读
评价一种教学刊物的成败得失、功过是非,关键在于读者使用频率的高低——特别是在教学第一线的读者。现在我就以这一身份,就贵刊的得失问趣,略述意见如下:一、重视教改理论探讨,但坚持得不够。贵刊开辟了“教改自由谈”一拦,我觉得很好,令人耳目一新。它是教改的窗口,通过这个窗口,可以了解当前国内教改的信息、动向、进程和各种提法。例如,1987年贵刊第一、二期连载《语文教学的整体观》一文,我看了很受启发,视野开
To evaluate the success or failure of a teaching journal, the merits and demerits, the key lies in the reader’s frequency of use - especially in the front line of the reader. Now, in this capacity, I would like to ask questions about the successes and failures of your journal. I would like to outline my views as follows: First, we must pay attention to the theory of teaching reform, but we must not insist on it enough. Your magazine has opened up a “talk about freedom of education reform”. I feel very good and it is refreshing. It is the window of education reform. Through this window, you can learn about the current domestic education reform information, trends, processes, and various references. For example, in 1987, the first and second issues of your magazine serialized the “Integrated View of Chinese Teaching”, I was very inspired and my vision was open.