有些人的缺席使诺贝尔文学奖这一百年始终充满了怀疑。听听那决定命运的18把椅子的辩解,我们对被这项大奖遗忘者的访问只是为了理解两个词:文学和理想主义。 这场不可能有结局的官司从诺贝尔文学奖的首次颁发就开始了,大家争论的焦点是:为什么不是托尔斯泰?这位现实主义的集大成者,他的作品无论是《战争与和平》还是《安娜·卡列尼娜》或《复活》,用“不朽”来定义都不为过,但是,即便整个欧洲的知识界都在为他呼喊,他也未 The absence of some people has always been doubtful of the Nobel Prize in Literature for a hundred years. Listen to the 18 chairs that justify the fate of the decision, and we were interviewed by the forgotten Grand Prize just to understand two words: literature and idealism. The impossible case of a lawsuit begins with the first Nobel Prize for Literature. The point of debate is: Why is not Tolstoy? A master of realism. His work is both “war and peace ”Or“ Anna Karenina ”or“ resurrection, ”with“ immortality ”to define is not an excuse, but even if the entire European intellectuals shout for him, he did not