统一国家法体系是多民族国家政治整合的法治基础和保障,但因其构建过程中多方面因素的制约,难以有效吸纳民族习惯法积极因素和全面考虑少数民族的合理利益诉求,从而导致难以避免与既有的民族习惯法冲突和矛盾,这就决定了适时适地进行国家调适的必要。解放初期,在族际通婚问题上国家法和习惯法的冲突表现为:族际通婚的积极政治意义及新《婚姻法》婚姻自由原则的确立使其获得了国家法上的合法性,而在少数民族的婚俗婚制、宗教条规及族权系统中却是严重越轨行为。但国家并没有僵硬推行国家法,而是主要通过运用政策的形式,创造了“和谐”、“互补”以及“团体的多元主义”为特征的调适方式,对今天具有借鉴价值。 However, due to the restriction of many factors in the process of its construction, it is difficult to effectively absorb the positive factors of ethnic customary law and fully consider the reasonable interest demands of ethnic minorities, which makes it hard to avoid Conflicts and contradictions with existing national customary law determine the necessity of national adaptation in a timely and appropriate manner. In the early period of liberation, the conflicts between state law and customary law on the issue of inter-ethnic marriages manifested in the positive political significance of inter-ethnic marriages and the establishment of the principle of marital freedom in the new Marriage Law which gave them legitimacy in national law. Ethnic marriage customs, religious rules and ethnic rights system is a serious misconduct. However, the state did not rigidly enforce the national law. Instead, it adopted the form of policy and created a mode of adjustment featuring “harmony,” “complementarity,” and “group pluralism.” value.