我们一直奇怪,我国古代阅读教学,就是读读背背,老师既不怎么讲解,一般也不提什么问题(除非书院讲学),老师几乎没有参与到学生的阅读之中,甚至读的背的还是言文脱节的东西,但学生还学得不赖。而今天,老师又提问,又讲解,忙得不亦乐乎,效果反而令人怀疑。这其中原因自然很复杂,但有一点很值得我们注意:也许正是由于古人在阅读教学中,教师几乎置身于学生的阅读之外,倒使学生的阅读成为了一种真正意义的阅读。在谁读、读谁、谁问、问谁的问题上,古人其实比我们高明。他 We have always been surprised that in ancient China, reading teaching was reading and reading. The teacher did not explain it very much and generally did not ask any questions (unless the college lectures). The teacher was hardly involved in the student’s reading, and even the back of the reading was still Words are out of line, but students are not bad at learning. Today, the teacher also asked questions and explained how busy she was. The effect was questionable. The reason for this is naturally very complicated, but one thing is worth our attention: perhaps because of the ancients’ reading teaching, the teacher was almost out of the student’s reading, but it made students’ reading a real sense of reading. The ancients are actually better than us in the question of who reads, who reads, who asks, and who is asked. he