近来,有业界人士认为,《公证法》关于担任公证员必须通过国家司法考试的规定并不符合经济欠发达地区的实际,即将公证资格的取得与司法资格的取得放在同一水平上不利于扩大公证员队伍,进而不利于公证队伍的发展。更提出“既然取得司法资格,为什么不去做法官、检察官或律师,而要去做一名相比之下社会地位低、工作风险大、工资待遇差的公证员”的质疑。实际上,这是用短浅眼光看待问题的结果。判断《公证法》的这条规定是否符合实际,是一个对眼前利益与长远利益进行取舍的问题。 Recently, some people in the industry believe that the notarization requirement of passing the national judicial examination in the Notary Law does not conform to the actual conditions in the economically underdeveloped regions. It is not conducive to expanding the scope of obtaining the notarial status and obtaining the judicial qualification at the same level Notary public, which in turn is not conducive to the development of notary public. But also raised the question of “why not go to court, a prosecutor or a lawyer and obtain a notary public with a low social status, high work risk and poor wages” as they have obtained judicial qualifications. In fact, this is the result of looking at the problem from a shallow perspective. Judging whether this provision of Notary Law is realistic or not is a question of choosing the immediate interests and long-term interests.