论文部分内容阅读
[案例]台湾居民陈某在1996年11月19日在湖南某市与大陆居民何某登记结婚,并于同日在某市公证处办理了结婚公证书,并向海基会寄送了公证书副本。1997年1月,陈某持此公证书到台湾海基会进行公证书正副本比对,准备拿到比对证明后,到台湾户政机关办理与何某的结婚登记。海基会在比对过程中发现,在海基会的电脑档案中,还有一份陈某的结婚公证书副本,而该副本是由广西某市公证处于1996年7月29日出具的,结婚公证书记载了陈某与大陆居民叶某于1996年7月28日在广西某市登记结婚。鉴之,1997年2月,台湾海基会致函中国公证员协会,就这一涉台婚姻公证提出
[Case] Taiwanese resident Chen registered his marriage with mainland resident He Mou on November 19, 1996 in a city in Hunan. He also got a notarized marriage certificate on the same day in a city notary office and sent a copy of notarial certificate to the SEF . In 1997 January, Chen holds this notarial certificate to the Taiwan Straits Exchange Foundation notarized copy comparison, ready to get proof of comparison, go to Taiwan’s household registration authorities and Hemou marriage registration. During the comparison process, SEF found that there was also a copy of the marriage certificate of Chen in SEF files. The copy was issued by a municipal notary office in Guangxi on July 29, 1996, Marriage notary records of Chen and mainland residents Yemou July 28, 1996 in Guangxi, a city registered marriage. In view of this, in February 1997, Taiwan’s Straits Exchange Foundation sent a letter to China Notary Association to raise this marriage-related notarization