论文部分内容阅读
法律语言既有精确性又有盖然性。我国现行刑法中的“其他”一词具有这方面的典型特征。本研究采用系统功能语言学的语篇语义观,分析“其他”一词在我国现行刑法中的语义趋向和语义韵特征,系统地探究该词在我国现行刑法中的意义及其与司法解释之间的逻辑语义关系。研究发现:1)该词具有犯罪情节、犯罪主体、犯罪方法、犯罪行为和犯罪对象五种语义趋向,并呈现出饱和型、增强型和主导型语义韵模式,具有中性或消极语义韵特征;2)该词在语篇层面上具有双重识别意义,引发消极评价意义,嵌入丰富的概念意义;3)该词所在的刑法语篇与其司法解释语篇在逻辑语义关系上是扩展关系,具有解释、延伸和提升三种次级关系。本文认为,采用语篇语义观对“其他”一词进行司法解释,可以有效地避免对其进行扩大或限制性解释。
Legal language is both precise and probabilistic. The “other” in current criminal law in our country has typical characteristics in this respect. This study uses the discourse semantics of Systematic Functional Linguistics to analyze the semantic tendency and semantic rhyme features of the word “other” in China’s current criminal law, and to systematically explore the significance of the term in our current criminal law and its relationship with the judiciary Explain the logical semantic relationship. The research found that: 1) The term has five semantic trends of crime, crime, crime, crime and criminal object, and presents a saturated, enhanced and dominant semantic rhyme pattern with neutral or negative semantic rhyme features ; 2) the word has double recognition meaning at the discourse level, triggering the negative evaluation meaning and embedding rich conceptual meaning; 3) the criminal law discourse where the word is located and its judicial interpretation discourse have an extended relation in logic semantic relationship, Explain, extend and enhance the three subordinate relations. This article argues that judicially interpreting the word “other” using discourse semantics can effectively avoid its expansion or restrictive interpretation.