论文部分内容阅读
上海“孟母堂”因袭私塾的读经传统,倡行不同于现代中国教育的另一种教育模式,被上海市教委确认为违法办学。“孟母堂”没有经过教育行政部门的许可而私自办学,采取不同于中国统一的教育方式和教育内容,确实违反了中国的教育法律制度;不过,如果从“孟母堂”的学生所享有的宪法权利——受教育权的角度考虑,则“孟母堂”的非法教育实践自有其值得肯定之处。教育行政管理部门不应该只是简单地加以禁止,而应该考虑将其纳入到现代法治的框架中来加以引导,使其能够合法地实践自由教育,以促进我国教育事业的进步。
Shanghai “Mengmu Church” followed the tradition of reading the private school, advocating different from the modern Chinese education, another education model, the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission confirmed as illegal school. “Meng Mu Tang” did not run its own education without the permission of the administrative department of education. It is indeed a violation of China’s education law system to adopt a different education method and content from China’s unity. However, if the constitution enjoyed by the students of Meng Mu Tang Right - the perspective of the right to education, the illegal education practice of “Mengmu Hall” has its own merits to be affirmed. Education administration should not simply ban it. Instead, it should consider bringing it into the framework of modern rule of law to guide it so that it can legally practice liberal education in order to promote the progress of education in our country.