论文部分内容阅读
目的比较三种评价方法在儿童保健工作中的应用价值,了解2014年全国儿童保健工作质量与开展情况。方法采用TOPSIS法、RSR法和线性插值法对全国各地区儿童保健工作进行综合评价,应用SPSS 17.0对排序结果进行Spearman相关性分析和差异性的秩和检验。结果 3种评价方法的评价结果各异,为保证结果的客观性,对3种方法综合排序,排序前三位的分别是江苏、上海和陕西,后三位的分别是青海、新疆和西藏。经Spearman相关分析,TOPSIS和线性插值法排序结果的一致性最好(r=0.969,P=0.000),其次是TOPSIS法和RSR法(r=0.883,P=0.000),RSR法和线性插值法(r=0.795,P=0.000)。结论 3种评价方法的排序结果具有较强的相关性,多种综合方法联合评价,其排序结果更能客观、准确、全面地反映全国各省市儿童保健情况。
Objective To compare the application value of three evaluation methods in child health care work and understand the quality and development of child health care work in 2014 in China. Methods TOPSIS, RSR and linear interpolation were used to evaluate the health care in all regions of China. Spearman correlation analysis and rank sum test were applied to SPSS 17.0. Results The evaluation results of three evaluation methods were different. To ensure the objectivity of the results, the three methods were comprehensively sorted. The top three ranked respectively Jiangsu, Shanghai and Shaanxi, the latter three were Qinghai, Xinjiang and Tibet. After Spearman correlation analysis, TOPSIS and linear interpolation had the best agreement (r = 0.969, P = 0.000), followed by TOPSIS and RSR (r = 0.883, P = 0.000), RSR and linear interpolation (r = 0.795, P = 0.000). Conclusion The ranking results of the three evaluation methods are highly correlated and the combination of multiple comprehensive methods can be combined. The ranking results can objectively, accurately and comprehensively reflect the health conditions of children in all provinces and cities in China.