论文部分内容阅读
在现阶段的国际法中,国家对国际犯罪(种族灭绝罪、危害人类罪、战争罪和侵略罪)的缺席的普遍管辖缺乏依据。没有条约规定缔约国有这样的权利或义务,习惯国际法中也不存在一项授权或要求国家这样做的规则。即使禁止国际犯罪构成国际强行法,并不能从中自动推导出任何国家有这样做的权利或义务。相反,它可能违反国家主权平等原则。国际社会应当努力完善各国的刑事司法体系,使其能够有能力和意愿惩治这种犯罪,并且应当建设一个独立公正有效的国际刑事法院,而不能舍本逐末,去追求缺席的普遍管辖。
At this stage of international law, there is a lack of basis for the universal jurisdiction of States in the absence of international crimes (genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and the crime of aggression). There are no treaties that provide for such rights or obligations in States parties and there is no rule in customary international law that authorizes or requires the State to do so. Even if the prohibition of international crimes constitutes an international coercive law, it can not automatically derive the right or obligation of any country to do so. On the contrary, it may violate the principle of the sovereign equality of nations. The international community should make every effort to perfect the criminal justice system of all countries so that they can have the ability and willingness to punish such crimes and should establish an independent and impartial and effective international criminal court instead of pursuing universal suffrage in pursuit of absent universal jurisdiction.