论文部分内容阅读
目的 :探讨小儿急救网络在抢救危重症患儿方面的应用价值。方法 :对2011年1月~2015年6月期间我院收治的361例危重症患儿的临床资料进行回顾性研究。按照转运方法的不同将这361例患儿分为自行转运组和小儿急救网络组,其中自行转运组有75例患儿,小儿急救网络组有286例患儿。自行转运组患儿均由其家长自行将其送入医院进行治疗,对小儿急救网络组患儿均使用小儿急救网络进行院前急救后将其送入医院进行治疗。然后,比较两组患儿在转运途中不良事件的发生率及其救治的效果。结果 :小儿急救网络组患儿在转运途中不良事件的发生率明显低于自行转运组患儿,二者相比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。小儿急救网络组患儿的救治效果明显优于自行转运组患儿,二者相比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 :小儿急救网络在抢救危重症患儿方面具有很高的应用价值。此方法可明显降低危重症患儿在转运途中不良事件的发生率,提高其救治的成功率,降低其死亡率。
Objective: To explore the value of pediatric emergency network in the rescue of critically ill children. Methods: The clinical data of 361 critically ill children admitted in our hospital from January 2011 to June 2015 were retrospectively studied. According to the different transport methods, the 361 children were divided into self-transport group and pediatric emergency network group, of which 75 cases were in autotransfusion group and 286 cases in pediatric emergency network group. Patients in their own transport group were all sent to the hospital for treatment by their parents. Children in the Pediatric Emergency Network Group were treated with pediatric emergency network for prehospital first aid before being sent to the hospital for treatment. Then, the incidence of adverse events and the effect of treatment were compared between the two groups. Results: The incidence of adverse events in pediatric emergency network group was significantly lower than that in the autotransfusion group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The treatment effect of pediatric emergency network group was better than that of autotransfusion group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: Pediatric emergency network has a high value in the rescue of critically ill children. This method can significantly reduce the incidence of adverse events in critically ill children during transport, improve the success rate of treatment and reduce their mortality.