今年第4期《导报》发表了一组针锋相对的文章。这场论战的核心,在于该不该“炒热房地产”,要害是一个“炒”字。 房地产“炒论”不是新生事物,对“炒论”的批驳也在90年代初就有过。与上次不同的是,这次明显得到了更多的理解和支持。房地产理论之所以能获此“阶段性胜利”,与其支付的惨重代价是直接 No. 4 this year, “Herald” published a tit-for-tat article. The core of this debate is that it should not “speculation hot real estate,” the key is a “speculation”. Real estate “speculation” is not a new thing, criticism of “speculation” also had in the early 90s. Unlike the previous one, this time obviously got more understanding and support. The reason why real estate theory can get this “stage victory”, rather than pay a heavy price is a direct