论文部分内容阅读
行为人基于其他目的杀死被害人之后产生取走被害人财物的目的,进而取得财物的行为,以及与实施杀害行为无关的第三人从死者身上取走财物的行为应该如何处理,理论上争论不断。文章认为早前观点中无论是盗窃罪说还是侵占罪说都存在各种值得商榷的地方,甚至有的学说还有明显的违背刑法基本理论的问题。晚近以来对侵占罪中“代为保管的他人财物”要素的重新解读既有可取之处,也有一些疑问,本文对此进行深度评析。
In theory, the perpetrator’s goal of taking away the victim’s property after the killing of the victim for other purposes, obtaining the property and obtaining the property from a deceased person by a third party not involved in the killings should theoretically continue to be controversial. The article holds that there are all kinds of debatable issues in the earlier arguments, whether it is theft or the crime of embezzlement. Some even have obvious problems that violate the basic theory of criminal law. Since lately, it has both merit and a few questions to re-interpret the elements of property misappropriation on behalf of others in embezzlement crime.