美国《科学》杂志最近刊文披露了美国科学院在院士选举问题上的争论:几人欢乐万人愁。每年,当60名科学家被声名卓著的美国科学院(NAS,它目前总共有1651名院士)接收为新院士而笑逐颜开时,更多的人则只能因希望破灭而叹息。可是,在名单被公布的同时,却几乎无人过问整个选拔的过程是否公正。只有华盛顿的《科学与政府报告》的编辑丹·格林伯格一直在不懈地指责美国科学院是一群排挤女性的大男子俱乐部。今年 The latest issue of the United States “Science” magazine has disclosed the controversy over the election of academicians of the American Academy of Sciences: A few people are happy and sad. Each year, when 60 scientists smile at the prestigious American Academy of Sciences (NAS), which now has a total of 1,651 academicians, for acceptance as new academics, more people can only sigh for hope. However, at the same time as the list was released, few were asked whether the entire selection process was fair. Only Dan Greenberg, editor of Washington's Science and Government Report, has been relentlessly accusing the Academy of Sciences of being a group of big men's clubs that crowd out women. this year