论文部分内容阅读
由北美学者主导的传播政治经济学继承了马克思主义传统的激进批判路径,这一宏大叙事的激进左翼批判传统,向来被认为是传播政治经济学的主要代表,并成为学界对政治经济学视野下传播和文化分析的主要理解对象。本文指出,这种理解忽略了传播政治经济批判内部的复杂性,尤其忽略了法国和英国等欧洲国家学者倡导的文化产业的中观和微观分析路径。这一路径从产业逻辑的经验分析入手,分析资本主义条件下文化产业经济活动的内在机制和矛盾,认为对宏观制度的分析批判不能脱离对具体文化产业内部经济活动的经验研究。本文认为,充分把握这两者的异同,对从中国语境出发找到符合本土传播研究实际的学术路径具有启发意义。
The political political economy dominated by North American scholars has inherited the radical and critical path of Marxist tradition. The radical leftist critical tradition of this grand narrative has always been regarded as the main representative of political economy dissemination and has become the focus of academic circles on political economy Communication and cultural analysis of the main object of understanding. This article points out that this understanding ignores the complexity of the internal dissemination of political and economic criticism, especially ignoring the medium and micro-analysis path of cultural industries advocated by scholars from European countries such as France and Britain. This path starts with the empirical analysis of industrial logic and analyzes the internal mechanisms and contradictions of the economic activities of cultural industries under the capitalist conditions. It holds that the analysis and critique of the macro-system can not be separated from the empirical studies on the internal economic activities of specific cultural industries. This article argues that a full grasp of the similarities and differences between the two is of great significance in finding a proper academic path from the perspective of Chinese context in line with the research of local communication.