目前,在大中城市里,两家合住一个单元的情况为数不少,经过精神文明建设,多数合住的邻里间能够合睦相处,但发生纠纷的仍不鲜见。从现有条件看,合住状况难以在短期内彻底消除,因此,对这种特殊的民事纠纷应引起相应的重视。第一,由主观原因而导致的取证难。从公民的作证意识看。实事求是地作证,是公民的法律义务,但现实中,有些公民的这一意识相当淡薄。作证似乎不是他的义务而是施舍,依法取证者倒成了乞讨者。笔者对作证心态曾做过随机调查,结果是,绝大多数人都认为多一事不如少一事。就说不知道,谁也没奈何。有些人则担心作证后,因其证词而导致不利后果的一方会报复,或影响关系。还有些人,虽然同意作证,但作证时却顾 At present, in large and medium-sized cities, there are a large number of cases in which two units are living together. After spiritual construction, the majority of the neighbors can live in harmony. However, disputes are still rare. Judging from the existing conditions, it is difficult to completely eliminate the situation of living together in a short period of time. Therefore, special attention should be paid to such special civil disputes. First, it is difficult to obtain evidence from subjective reasons. Judging from the citizen’s testimony. To testify truthfully and truthfully is a legal obligation of citizens. In reality, however, some of these citizens have a very weak sense of this. The testimony did not seem to be his obligation but to give alms, and the witnesses according to law turned into beggars. The author has done a random survey of the mentality of testimony, the result is that most people think more than one thing less. Do not know that, no one no choice. Some fear that, after testifying, those who have been adversely affected by their testimony may retaliate or affect the relationship. Others, though agreeing to testify, have given their testimony