论文部分内容阅读
编辑同志: 寄上一篇有争论的中考命题作文,希望能借贵刊一角开展一场关于怎样掌握考场命题作文评分标准的讨论。我参加这次娄底地区初中毕业会考的作文评卷工作,在几天艰苦的评卷工作中,当看到这篇文章时,觉是同类作文中不可多得的佳作。但我没有急于凭自己的印象打分,还是广泛征求了一同阅卷的教师和当时在场的有关领导的意见,结果听到两种完全不同的评价。有赞成“给高分”的,也有主张“不能及格”的。同一篇作文在不同的阅卷老师手中,其得分之差将在二十分左右,这对写作文的考生来说,将意味着什么呢?评分标准悬殊,影响所及决不只是个别考生
Editor comrades: Send an essay on the controversial examination papers and hope to use the corner of your magazine to conduct a discussion on how to master the scoring criteria of the proposition composition. I participated in the composition evaluation work of the junior high school graduation examination in Loudi area. In the hard work of the evaluation of the number of days, when I saw this article, I felt that it was a rare masterpiece of similar compositions. However, I did not hurry to score with my own impressions. I still asked for the opinions of teachers who were graduating together and the leaders who were present at the time. I heard two completely different opinions. There are those who support “high scores,” and those who claim “failed.” The same composition in the hands of different scoring teachers, the difference between the score will be about twenty, which will mean for the candidate writing the text? Rating standards are widely disparity, the impact is not just individual candidates