不久前,河南大学生闫某因为“掏鸟窝”被判刑的新闻持续在网上发酵,且争议颇多。此案争论的背后终归是不同主体对大学生捕猎燕隼这一行为的违法性认识程度存在差异。又如之前曝出的天价葡萄案、少年网购仿真枪案等,都反映了不同人对违法性认识程度存有差异导致对判决结果预期的冲突。那么,到底什么 Not long ago, Yan, a college student in Henan Province, was convicted because of “digging a bird’s nest.” News on the Internet continued to be fermented on the Internet, and there were quite a lot of controversies. Behind the controversy in the case is that there is a difference in understanding of the illegality of the behavior of college students hunting Falcon. Another example is the price of grape bought before the case, the juvenile online shopping simulation gun case, all reflect the different levels of awareness of the illegal existence of different lead to the expected result of the conflict. So what is it?