论文部分内容阅读
刚从教的那几年,每次作文批改发下后,学生匆匆一阅,就束之高阁,对作文能力的提高收效甚微。针对这种现状,作文评改的方法应力求多样化。教师的评改怎样才能得到学生细心领会呢?笔者认为应在评语上花些气力,作文评语要具有语言力量。评语大致包括眉批、旁批、总批等方式。眉批、旁批一般要简明概括、一语中的,力求具体、实用。总批则要适当长些,站得高些,努力从全面着眼,评出特点,评出方向,带有理论指导作用或实践意义。
Just a few years after teaching, each time the composition was revised and sent down, the students hurriedly read and read the book, and they were left alone. They had little effect on the improvement of their compositional abilities. In response to this situation, the method of compositional review strives to diversify. How can the teacher’s evaluation change be understood by the students? The author thinks that it is necessary to spend some effort on the comments and that the composition comments should have the language power. The reviews generally include eyebrow approval, side approval, and general approval. The eyebrow approval and side approval are generally concise, summarizing, and strive to be specific and practical. The general approval team must be more appropriate, stand higher, and strive to comprehensively evaluate the characteristics and the direction, with theoretical guidance or practical significance.