论文部分内容阅读
司法能动主义往往和司法审查以及对宪法的解释联系在一起。在中国,由于司法机关要承担服务大局的政治使命,而且要服务于党在不同历史时期所确立的根本任务和发展目标,这些使命、任务和目标不一定必然与司法实务相关,这就决定了中国式的能动司法不具有司法的独立品性。在中国,法院既无司法审查权和宪法解释权,更无法官造法的权利,所以中国的司法能动并非真正意义上的司法能动主义,中国现实国情也不可能产生真正意义上的司法能动主义。
Judicial activism is often associated with judicial review and constitutional interpretation. In China, since the judiciary has to assume the political mission of serving the overall interests and serve the fundamental and developmental goals established by the Party in different historical periods, these missions, tasks and objectives are not necessarily related to judicial practice, which determines Chinese-style active judicial system does not have the independent character of judicature. In China, the courts have neither the power of judicial review nor the power of constitutional interpretation, nor the right to create a law. Therefore, the judicial initiative of China is not real judicial activism, and the real situation of China can not produce real judicial activism .