论文部分内容阅读
徐复观与熊十力的分歧体现为两种不同的“疏释”。熊十力通过诠释经典所建构的心学体系并未回应现代实证史学的诘难,仍是“古代的疏释”。而徐复观“现代的疏释”则通过历史语境学式思想史的方法,在现代学术范式中重彰经史系统,其不仅回应哲学的批判,更规避了考据学的疏缺。徐复观的思想史有效地纾解了近现代经学危机,维持了儒学精神在庶民社会继续传播的可能。
The disagreements between Xu Fuguan and Xiong Shili reflect two different kinds of “explanation”. Xiong Shi-li through the interpretation of the classic structure of the heart of the system did not respond to modern empirical history of the difficulties, is still “the ancient release”. However, Xu Fuguan ’s Modern Reflections ’ is a way of emphasizing the history system in the modern academic paradigm through the study of the historical thinking style of intellectual history. It not only responds to the criticism of philosophy, but also avoids the lack of textual criticism. Xu Fuguan’s thought history effectively relieved the crisis of modern Confucian classics and maintained the possibility that Confucianism will continue to spread in common people’s society.