论文部分内容阅读
随着“春秋经”即“鲁春秋”这一观点的被确认,孟子、司马迁的“孔子作《春秋》”之说遂受怀疑和否定。笔者通过考证,提出:孔子作《春秋》确有其事;孔子所作《春秋》非“经”而是“传”——即《左传》之蓝本。除了先秦典籍,笔者还探考汉初学坛,从中找到了有力的佐证。一、从汉初称引探考孔《春秋》真相在司马迁的《史记》问世以前,孔子作《春秒》的业绩已被汉人广为称颂。巨儒名家如陆贾、淮南王刘安、董仲舒等,在他
With the notion of “Spring and Autumn,” that is, “Lu Chunqiu”, Mencius and Sima Qian’s “Confucius made Spring and Autumn” was suspect and rejected. The author through the research, put forward: Confucius as “Spring and Autumn” is indeed a matter; Confucius made “Spring and Autumn” non “” by “but” “pass” - that is, “Zuo Zhuan” of the blueprint. In addition to pre-Qin classics, I also explore the early Han Dynasty, find strong evidence. First, from the beginning of the Han dynasty, cited the hole in the “Spring and Autumn” truth In Sima Qian’s “Historical Records” come out, Confucius “Spring Seconds” performance has been widely praised Han. Giant Confucianism such as Lu Jia, Huainan Wang Liu An, Dong Zhongshu, etc., in him