刑事诉讼过程的侦查、提起公诉、审判三个阶段对案件事实的认定都需要运用证据加以证明。新旧刑事诉讼法对这三个阶段适用的证明标准是同一的,没有层次性区分。这样的规定是否符合司法实际,已经引起了司法理论界和实务界的关注和争论。笔者认为刑事证明标准在侦查、起诉、审判三环节是否应有所区别见仁见智,但应有多元性和层次性。为有效适用于司法实践,对证据确实充分的理解也应准确,符合立法原意。 The criminal procedure process of investigation, prosecution, trial of the three stages of the facts found in the case requires the use of evidence to prove. The old and new criminal procedure law applies to all three phases with the same standard of proof and no hierarchical distinction. Whether such provisions conform to the actual conditions of the judiciary has aroused the concern and controversy of judicial theory circles and practical circles. The author believes that the standards of criminal proof in the investigation, prosecution, trial links should be the difference between the different opinions, but should be multi-level and hierarchical. In order to effectively apply to judicial practice, it is also true that the evidence is sufficiently well understood and in line with the original legislative intent.