论文部分内容阅读
由于政治制度、社会传统和法制环境的迥然差别,中外边缘法学研究和发展有很大区别。外国边缘法学虽然产生比较早,有二百年历史,但姑终停留在数量的变化上,质量上的变化却没有受到应有的重视,而且发展的速度非常缓慢,严重影响了边缘法学学科部类的形成。中国边缘法学虽然出现比较晚,但发展的速度相当迅速,在短期内产生众多具体学科,也在理论建设方面取得了根本性的突破,使边缘法学初步形成了完整的学科架构。中外边缘法学研究的差异决定了中外边缘法学发展的互补,只有在相互补充、相互吸收的基础上,边缘法学学科部类才能得到更好的发展,也才能在法律活动和实践中发挥更加积极的作用。
Due to the very different political systems, social traditions and the legal environment, there is a great difference between the research and the development of Chinese and foreign fringe jurisprudence. Although the law of foreland fringe was born earlier and has 200 years of history, the quality of the law of change has not been given the attention due to the fact that the law of the foreigners is still in the process of change. The pace of development is very slow, which seriously affects the discipline of the law of the edge Class formation. Although relatively late in China’s fringe jurisprudence, its pace of development has been rather rapid. In the short term, a large number of specific disciplines have emerged and a fundamental breakthrough has been made in theoretical construction so that the law of fringe has formed a complete academic framework. The difference between Chinese and foreign marginal jurisprudence research determines the complementarities between Chinese and foreign marginal jurisprudence. Only by complementing each other and absorbing each other can we get a better development of the discipline of marginal law, and can also play a more active role in legal activities and practices effect.