一、司法监督制度中是否有法院可以主动监督的例外情况 法院对仲裁实行必要的司法监督,这是各国仲裁制度的通例。法院进行司法监督的途径主要有两个:一是在审查是否撤销仲裁裁决时进行;二是在审查是否不予执行仲裁裁决时进行。法院的司法监督在绝大多数国家都是实行事后监督,即在仲裁裁决作出后,在一方当事人申请撤销(或申请强制执行)该裁决基础上开始实施监督,而对裁决作出之前仲裁庭的具体审理过程则不得干预。这已成为当今国际上的通例。我国仲裁法遵循了这一通例,采取了事后监督的做法,遍观仲裁法及其他有关法律,没有一个 First, the judicial supervision system whether there are courts can take the initiative to monitor the exception of the courts of arbitration to implement the necessary judicial supervision, which is the general arbitration system in various countries. There are two main ways for the courts to exercise judicial supervision: one is to examine whether to revoke the arbitral award; the other is to examine whether the arbitral award is not enforced. Judicial oversight by the courts is subject to ex-post supervision in most countries, that is, after the arbitral award is made, supervision begins on the application of one of the parties for revocation (or application for enforcement), and the specifics of the arbitral tribunal before the award is made Trial proceedings should not interfere. This has become a common international practice today. Arbitration Law of our country has followed this general principle, adopted the practice of supervision afterwards, and viewed the Arbitration Law and other relevant laws, none of which