越南现象学家陈德草作为法国现象学运动中一个极其重要的哲学家,对胡塞尔思想有着卓越的洞见。他沿着胡塞尔本人的思路,将现象学研究分成四个层次,并探究每个层次上的得失。陈氏认为,现象学在发展过程中产生了许多内部问题,而这些问题最终指向的是意识成就的起源。先验现象学试图借助构造和发生的方法来回答,但陈氏认为,一方面,观念论无论如何都免不了对物质性的回避,而正面解释物质性才是唯一出路,另一方面,现象学对于观念性的解释迫使自身不断超出观念论的限度走向实在论,因此,唯物论以及实在界运动的辩证法才是现象学的必然归宿。笔者认为,虽然陈德草对现象学的见解颇为精深,但其最终结论是站不住脚的,辩证唯物论或实在论不仅无法解决所谓的现象学困境,而且自身同样面临着理解和阐释的难题。 Vietnamese phenomenologist Tran Chen, an extremely important philosopher in the French phenomenological movement, has excellent insight into Husserl’s thinking. Following Husserl’s own thinking, he divided phenomenological research into four levels and explored the pros and cons of each level. Chen believes that phenomenology in the development process has created many internal problems, and these problems ultimately point to the origin of the conscious achievement. Transcendental phenomenology tries to answer the questions by means of construction and occurrence. However, on the one hand, Chen believes that on the one hand, ideology can not avoid material avoidance, but positive interpretation of materiality is the only way out. On the other hand, phenomenology For conceptual explanation, it forces itself to go beyond the limit of concept theory to realism. Therefore, dialectics of materialism and real world movement is the inevitable result of phenomenology. The author believes that although Chen De-wei has a rather profound phenomenology, his final conclusion is untenable. Dialectical materialism or realism can not only solve the so-called phenomenological dilemma, but also face the same understanding and interpretation The problem