论文部分内容阅读
本文旨在比较内镜下注射和热探头治疗消化性溃疡大出血的疗效。病人和方法从1990年6月～1991年11月消化性溃疡大出血病人204例中选择120例。入选者至少具备下述危险因素之一:60岁以上,开始血红蛋白<100g/L 或休克,脉搏>100次/min 和/或收缩压<100mmHg 的活动性出血或具有非出血性可见血管的病人。记录病人的抽烟史、非类固醇抗炎药(NSAID)应用史和心、肺疾病史。排除有严重肝、肾疾病、上消化道恶性肿瘤或广泛转移性疾病者。随机将病人分为注射组和热探头组,两组的年龄、入院时血
This article aims to compare endoscopic injection and thermal probe treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding effect. Patients and Methods A total of 120 patients were selected from 204 patients with peptic ulcer bleeding from June 1990 to November 1991. Participants had at least one of the following risk factors: active bleeding over 60 years of age, active bleeding with onset of hemoglobin <100 g / L or shock, pulse> 100 beats / min, and / or systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg or patients with non- hemorrhagic visible blood vessels . The patient’s smoking history, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) application history and heart and lung disease history were recorded. Excluding severe liver and kidney disease, upper gastrointestinal cancer or a wide range of metastatic disease. The patients were randomly divided into injection group and heat probe group, two groups of age, blood at admission