论文部分内容阅读
2011年《刑法修正案(八)》中新增了“不强迫任何人证实自己有罪”、“讯问录音录像制度”、“律师提前至侦查阶段介入”等条款,这在保证讯问对象自愿供述的权利方面具有进步意义,但也给实践中的讯问工作带来了挑战,如何在保障讯问对象权利的前提下获得真实、稳定的供述成为讯问工作中亟需解决的问题。刑事侦查讯问是讯问人员与讯问对象之间的一场“面对面”的博弈过程,法律所规定的“坦白从宽”等供述激励是讯问对象在讯问博弈中的最大期望收益,引导着理性讯问对象的供述动机。本文从侦查讯问与博弈相结合的角度探析供述激励机制的原理及具体优化措施。
In the 2011 Criminal Law Amendment (8), the articles “Do not force anyone to prove guilty”, “Interrogation recording and recording system”, “Lawyer advance to investigation stage intervention” were added However, it also poses a challenge to the practice of interrogation. How to obtain a true and stable confession under the premise of protecting the rights of interrogators becomes an urgent problem to be solved in interrogation. Criminal investigation interrogation is a “face-to-face” game process between interrogators and interrogators. The confession excitation prescribed by law such as “confession” is the maximum expected return of the interrogation subject in the interrogation game and leads Confession motives of rational interrogation objects. This paper explores the principle and specific optimization measures of the confession incentive mechanism from the perspective of investigative interrogation and game theory.