论文部分内容阅读
本通报53年12月号第559页登载着这一问题和解答。我看了以後,觉得对解答有着一点不同的意见。斯大林同志教导我们说,如果没有不同意见的争论,没有自由的批评,任何科学都不能发展;不可能进步的。故特将我的意见提来和同志们商讨。答者对於回答这个问题,曾费了一番工夫,我们是可以看见的,他首先提出“水系化学”,再提出“液体氨系化学”而後作出“在液体氨中所生的离子反应与在水里的反应完全相反”的断语,随即对断语加以解释,并写出镁和两种铵盐在液体氨中对NH_4~+的置换反应方程式,最後作出结论:“这样就证明了游离的铵是不存在的”。但这样的回答,是把
This issue and answer is posted on page 559 of December 53, 2005. After I read it, I think I have a slightly different opinion on the answer. Comrade Stalin has taught us that no science can develop without the arguments of different opinions and without free criticism; it is impossible to make progress. Therefore, I put my opinion to discuss with my comrades. The respondent spent a lot of time answering this question. We can see that he first proposed “water chemistry” and then proposed “liquid ammonia chemistry” and then made “the reaction of ions generated in liquid ammonia with In the water exactly the opposite reaction, ”the phrase, then immediately to explain the term, and write out the magnesium and ammonium salts of ammonia in liquid ammonia NH_4 ~ + replacement reaction equation, concludes:“ This proves that the free Ammonia is absent. ” But such answer is to put