论文部分内容阅读
举证责任倒置是举证责任分配的重要问题。我国《民事诉讼法》未明确规定举证责任倒置。最高人民法院2001年12月6日制定的《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》第四条对此有反映。在此前最高人民法院颁布的司法解释中,侵权诉讼的举证责任倒置一直是重要内容之一。比如,最高人民法院1992年7月通过的《关于适用民事诉讼法若干问题的意见》第74条规定的举证责任倒置六种
The inversion of the burden of proof is an important issue in the distribution of burden of proof. China’s “Civil Procedure Law” does not clearly provide for the reversal of the burden of proof. Article 4 of the “Provisions on Evidence in Civil Proceedings” formulated by the Supreme People’s Court on December 6, 2001 reflects this. In the judicial interpretation promulgated by the Supreme People’s Court earlier, the inversion of the burden of proof in tort litigation has always been one of the important contents. For example, the Supreme People’s Court in July 1992 passed the “Opinions on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Civil Procedure Law,” the provisions of Article 74 of the burden of proof upside down six