论文部分内容阅读
结构主义叙事学注重文本整体性与内部要素的关系研究,而米勒正是从这一维度出发试图进行文学的解构。但作为文学自身的拆解与颠覆方式,解构主义又难以与结构主义真正实现二元对立,这种矛盾性思维在《解读叙事》中得到有效地传达。从《解读叙事》出发,就反逻各斯中心主义与叙事文本的线条维度阐释文学的解构与文本未定性表现,进而从更深远的范围内看到米勒在对形式主义的继承与超越过程中所陷入的矛盾心态。
Structuralist narratology focuses on the study of the relationship between integrality of texts and internal elements, and it is from this dimension that Miller attempted to deconstruct literature. However, as a way of dismantling and subverting literature itself, it is difficult for deconstructionism to truly realize binary opposition with structuralism. Such contradictory thinking is effectively conveyed in “reading narratives.” From the point of “interpreting narration”, this article explains the deconstruction of literature and the indefinite expression of text on the lines of anti-logos centrism and narrative texts, and then from a more far-reaching perspective, it can be seen that Miller’s succession and transcendence of formalism In the contradictory state of mind caught.