论文部分内容阅读
目的 :比较燥湿止痒水与常规淡盐水 (0 1% )坐浴对混合痔术后创口康复的疗效。方法 :用抽签法将 12 0例混合痔术后患者随机分为A组 (燥湿止痒水组 )、B组 (淡盐水组 ) ,对比观察各疗程创口水肿消失例数及比率、结痂例数及比率。结果 :二疗程后 ,A组水肿消失率达 10 0 % ,B组 83% ;有极显著差异 (P <0 0 0 1)。 3疗程后A组结痂率达 93% ;B组 80 % (P <0 0 5 )。结论 :燥湿止痒水坐浴对混合痔术后康复效果优于常规淡盐水坐浴。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the curative effect of hemorrhoidectomy and postoperative wound healing after the combination of dampness and itch water and conventional mild salt water (0 1%) bath. Methods: One hundred and twenty patients with mixed hemorrhoid were randomly divided into group A (Dampness & Anti-itch water group) and group B (Light saline group) by lottery method. The number and rate of disappearance of wound edema in each course of treatment were compared and scored Number of cases and ratio. Results: After two courses of treatment, the disappearance rate of Edema in group A was 100% and that in group B was 83%. There was a significant difference (P <0.01). After 3 courses of treatment, the rate of scab in group A was 93% and that in group B was 80% (P <0.05). Conclusion: The effect of wet and itch water bath on postoperative hemorrhoid hemorrhoid rehabilitation is better than that of normal salt water bath.