M-受体与α-受体阻滞剂联合用药治疗良性前列腺增生及下尿路症状的临床观察

来源 :中华医学杂志 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:icerjack
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的评价 M-受体阻滞剂与α-受体阻滞剂联合用药治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)下尿路症状(LUT)的有效性及安全性。方法选择经1周特拉唑嗪治疗后,梗阻症状缓解,但刺激症状仍明显的 BPH/LUT 患者69例,主要的排除标准为最大尿流率(Q_(max))<10 ml/s、残余尿>50 ml、前列腺体积>50 ml。随机分成两组,特拉唑嗪组给予特拉唑嗪治疗,联合用药组给予托特罗定与特拉唑嗪联合治疗。用药时间6周,评估内容包括总症状评分(IPSS)及梗阻症状评分及刺激症状评分、尿流率和残余尿量等,并登记不良事件。结果两组间基础临床指标比较差异无统计学意义。用药6周后联合用药组 IPSS 评分由19.1±2.9降低到14.0±4.2,P<0.001。刺激症状评分由13.2±3.2降至9.2±2.9,P<0.001。特拉唑嗪组 IPSS 评分由18.5±3.2降低到17.3±4.1,P=0.033。刺激症状评分由12.7±3.1降至11.7±3.0,P=0.001。治疗后两组间比较显示:(1)联合用药组 IPSS 评分的改善优于特拉唑嗪组(-5.09 vs -1.19,P<0.001),联合用药组刺激评分的改善优于特拉唑嗪组(-4vs -1,P<0.001),而梗阻症状评分的改善两组间差异无统计学意义(-1.09 vs -0.2,P<0.168)。(2)治疗6周后两组间 Qmax、残余尿差异无统计学意义。联合用药组无急性尿潴留和其他严重并发症发生。结论托特罗定与α-受体阻滞剂联合应用于前列腺轻中度肥大、轻中度肥大的患者,可不同程度降低患者 IPSS 评分,其中以刺激症状评分的改善更明显。未见严重不良反应和急性尿潴留出现。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination of M-blockers and α-blockers in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUT) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods Sixty - nine BPH / LUT patients with symptomatic relief of obstructive symptoms were treated with terazosin for one week. The main exclusion criteria were maximal flow rate (Q max) <10 ml / s, Residual urine> 50 ml, prostate volume> 50 ml. Randomly divided into two groups, terazosin group terazosin treatment, combination therapy group was given tocloster and terazosin combination therapy. The medication time was 6 weeks. The evaluation included the total symptom score (IPSS), obstructive symptom score and irritation symptom score, urinary flow rate and residual urine volume, and registered the adverse events. Results There was no significant difference in basic clinical indexes between the two groups. After 6 weeks of treatment, the IPSS score of combination group decreased from 19.1 ± 2.9 to 14.0 ± 4.2, P <0.001. The irritation symptom score decreased from 13.2 ± 3.2 to 9.2 ± 2.9, P <0.001. The terazosin group IPSS score decreased from 18.5 ± 3.2 to 17.3 ± 4.1, P = 0.033. Stimulation symptoms decreased from 12.7 ± 3.1 to 11.7 ± 3.0, P = 0.001. After treatment, the comparison between the two groups showed that: (1) the improvement of IPSS score in combination group was better than that of terazosin group (-5.09 vs -1.19, P <0.001); the improvement of stimulation score in combination group was better than that of terazosin Group (-4 vs -1, P <0.001), while there was no significant difference between the two groups in improvement of obstruction symptom score (-1.09 vs -0.2, P <0.168). (2) There was no significant difference in Qmax and residual urine between the two groups after 6 weeks of treatment. The combination group had no acute urinary retention and other serious complications. Conclusion The combination of tolterodine and α-blockers in mild to moderate hypertrophy of patients with mild to moderate hypertrophy can reduce the degree of IPSS in patients with varying degrees, of which the improvement of the symptom score is more obvious. No serious adverse reactions and acute urinary retention occurred.
其他文献
目的 笔者对肺结核空洞进行CT形态学分型,分析其病理基础.探讨空洞分型在肺结核的诊断、分型及治疗中的意义.方法 收集伴有空洞的肺结核病人76例,按洞壁性质将空洞分为薄壁空
目的:探讨低位直肠癌保肛术后吻合口漏的原因及合理有效的防治方法.方法:对低位直肠癌全系膜切除低位吻合手术后吻合口漏的发生及治疗情况进行回顾性分析.对吻合口漏的患者采
近年来,随着外保温及装饰材料的普遍应用,高层建筑火灾呈现出沿外部墙面蔓延的新特点.传统的固定灭火设施设置于建筑物内,无法对外墙火灾进行有效施救.针对上述问题,提出了高
现如今线路走廊征地,投资大,阻扰多,考虑节省投资,充分利用原有的线路走廊,经常是长长的线路上在出口不远处有新的线路新的变电站T接上来。此时长短线路的配合就很困难,为了解决这
建筑空调系统作为建筑工程重要附属设施,其节能设计对于促进在建筑智能绿色化发展具有重要的作用.本文首先概述了建筑中央空调系统节能设计的原则,进而从系统主机、水循环以
在国家可持续发展战略的引领下,电力经营体制的转变事关市场经济建设,经济和社会的进步,缓解电力供需矛盾,提高人们生活和进一步发展电力企业。本文基于长期的基层工作实践,
目的设计及制作放射性塑料胆管支架,评价其可行性和安全性。方法设计及制作携带~(125)Ⅰ粒子的塑料支架。选用健康家养猪16只,胆总管植入放射性塑料胆管支架,放射计划系统(TP
真性红细胞增多症的病因和发病机制目前尚不清楚。近年来对其分子发病机制进行了深入研究。本文对此进行综述。
髓系白血病有很多好的分子靶点,而且许多针对这些靶点的新药正在临床试验当中。随着后基因时代的到来,将会找出更多的新靶点,将会出现更多的靶点治疗药物。芯片和蛋白质组学
目的 探讨类风湿关节炎(RA)和可溶性人糖皮质激素诱导型肿瘤坏死因子受体(shGITR)的关系.方法 采用双抗体夹心酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)测定RA患者(37例)、骨关节炎(OA)患者(2