论文部分内容阅读
近六十多年来,学术界在马克思主义哲学指导下,对刘勰的《文心雕龙》作了解读。同是一部《文心雕龙》,同一个作者,由于不同的人、不同的解读,得出的结论甚至完全相反。如《文心雕龙》反应出来的作者的世界观,有人说是唯物主义的、有人说是唯心主义的,甚至是客观主义的。其方法论有人说是形而上学的、是循环论、是外因论,也有人说是唯物辩证的。唯心主义说结论的得出,大都曲解了《文心雕龙》中的“太极”、“神理”等词,甚至脱离了《文心雕龙》文本,把刘勰一生的不同阶段混为一谈,没有把刘勰从政前和从政后区别开来,从中作祟的根源就是“唯成分论”。
In the recent sixty years, under the guidance of Marxist philosophy, academics have interpreted Liu Xie’s Wen Xin Diao Long. With the same “Wen Xin Diao Long”, the same author, due to different people, different interpretation, draw the conclusion even the exact opposite. Some people say that they are materialist, some say idealist, and even objectivist. Some people say that the methodology is metaphysical, is the theory of circulation, is the theory of externality, some people say that materialist dialectical. According to the conclusions of idealism, most of the words in “Wen Xin Diao Long”, such as “Tai Chi” and “Shen Li”, even misinterpreted the text of “Wen Xin Diao Long” Stage confused, did not distinguish Liu from the pre-political and post-political differences, the root cause from which is “the only component theory.”