论文部分内容阅读
对上古汉语“N之V”结构的性质存在争议,其根源在于既有研究仅注重部分外部功能,而基本忽视了其形式特征的考虑。本文参考语言类型学对名词化结构的研究,尝试发掘“N之V”结构的形式特征,并重新审视其外部功能,对其性质作重新考察。上古“N之V”结构与典型名词化结构差距很大,和动名词、分词也有所差另,而更接近限定从句。据此本文认为,“N之V”结构谓词性很强,接近限定从句,“之”不是名词化标记,而是从属性标记。
The reason for the controversy over the nature of the “V” structure of the Middle Ages in ancient Chinese lies in the fact that the existing studies only focus on some external functions while basically neglecting their formal characteristics. Based on the study of nominalization in linguistic typology, this paper attempts to explore the formal features of the “V ” structure of N and reexamine its external functions and reexamine its nature. The ancient “N of V ” structure and the typical nominal structure of the gap is very big, and nouns, participle is also somewhat different, but closer to the limited clause. Therefore, this paper argues that the structure of “N ’s V ” is highly predicative and close to the qualified clauses. “” Is not a nominal token, but a property token.