当前,有些基层人民法院在办理民事案件过程中,为了克服任务重、人员少和考察书记员的办案能力,由分管院长指定书记员,以“代理审判员”的身份审理案件,并在法律文书上以“代理审判员”的名义署名,参加合议庭开庭审判案件时,则与审判员一起,作为台议庭成员,也以“代理审判员”的身份署名下判决。笔者认为这种做法不可取,应予纠 At present, some grassroots-level people’s courts handle civil cases with the task of “acting as judges” in order to overcome the difficulty of handling tasks and fewer personnel and inspectors’ clerks. When the instrument is signed in the name of “proxy judge” to participate in the trial of the collegial bench, the judge, along with the judge, shall be sentenced as a member of the Taiwan Chamber of Deputies and also under the signature of “judicial representative”. I think this approach is not desirable, should be corrected