论文部分内容阅读
目的:本研究旨在将帕多瓦量表-华盛顿州立大学修订版(Padua Inventory-Washington State University Revision,PI-WSUR)引进中国,考察PI-WSUR在中国非临床样本中的效度和信度。方法:随机抽取673名大学生完成各项量表,并对其中的153名大学生进行了重测。结果:效度检验:检验结构效度获得个5因素,与原量表一致,各因素都具有良好的区分效度(P<0.05;P<0.001)和校标效度(P<0.01);信度检验:PI-WSUR总分的α系数为0.90,各因素α系数分别为0.77,0.80,0.87,0.80,0.74,重测信度分别为0.59,0.53,0.61,0.74,0.60。本研究在PI-WSUR总分上未发现性别差异,但是女性被试在“污染/清洗强迫”的得分显著高于男性(P<0.000);男性被试在“伤害他人/自己的强迫冲动”的得分显著高于女性(P<0.01)。结论:PI-WSUR具备合格的效度和信度。
PURPOSE: This study aims to introduce the Padua Inventory-Washington State University Revision (PI-WSUR) into China to examine the validity and reliability of PI-WSUR in non-clinical Chinese samples. Methods: A total of 673 undergraduates were randomly selected to complete various scales and 153 of them were retested. Results: Validity test: The structural validity of the test was validated by 5 factors, which were consistent with the original scale. All the factors had good discrimination (P <0.05; P <0.001) and school validity (P <0.01). Reliability test: The α-coefficient of the PI-WSUR total score was 0.90, the α coefficients of each factor were 0.77,0.80,0.87,0.80,0.74, and the retest reliability were 0.59,0.53,0.61,0.74,0.60 respectively. No gender differences were found in the PI-WSUR total score, but female subjects scored significantly higher in the Pollution / Cleansing Forces than in the male (P <0.000); male subjects were significantly more likely to harm others / themselves Forced impulses scored significantly higher than females (P <0.01). Conclusion: PI-WSUR has acceptable validity and reliability.